Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to interactiv-group.ch

INTERACTIV GROUP SUISSE | Entreprise de développement internet et intranet, webdesign, web et communication · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
63match
3hoss.com
3hoss.com | The digital home for Eric Hoss
2 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
63match
hanniya.com
hanniya | ux designer and developer
2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
61match
datadrivenpmm.com
My Framer Site
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
61match
elisewangxinyi.com
Elise's Work
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
60match
d3vlab.com
D3VLAB
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryweb-development
58match
iteka.com
Web Design by Iteka, Internet Technology Applications
1 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-development
58match
michael-serpe.com
Michael Serpe's Portfolio Website
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
57match
davidfozo.com
Home | David Fozo
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryweb-development
57match
cryptwareinfotech.com
Home - Cryptware Infotech
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryweb-development
57match
binarycodeservices.com
BinaryCode Services | Website Design and Development Company
2 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-development
57match
3coredigital.com
3CORE DIGITAL | Web Design & Development on Vancouver Island
2 co-citations2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
56match
anirudhkrishna.com
Anirudh Krishna - Designer | Developer | Innovator
2 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.