Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to intentapp.dev

Intent · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
intentrixa.com
Intentrixa
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
pitetris.com
Pitetris - Software Solutions
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
piinteris.com
PI Interis
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
maxsio.com
Maxsio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
intentini.com
Intentini Portal MVP
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
thekabagroup.com
The Kaba Group
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
intellicit.com
IntelliCit
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
andrewtwest.com
The Public Void – Andy West's Blog: Software Development and More
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
intelixtech.com
Home | Intelix Tech Limited
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
intellicorpgroup.com
IntelliCorp
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
faruktutkus.com
Faruk Tutkus | Creative Developer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
interwebalchemy.com
Interweb Alchemy
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
djlsystems.com
DJL Systems | Full-Stack Software Development & AI Solutions
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
intelluna.com
Intelluna
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
intellisum.app
Intellisum
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
intellidfd.com
IntelliDFD
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
kun-js.com
Kun — Intent-driven code generator
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
nevzatarman.com
nevzatarman – Software Developer & Designer (MBA)
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.