Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to intangibleian.com

Ian Atwater, Digitalized · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
63match
soifeel.com
So I Feel – a Digital Emotional Assistant and Poetry site
1 shared topicspoetry
63match
divan-hafez.com
Divan Hafez (The Persian English Dynamic Lexicon):::: Digital Humanities - Uni Leipzig
1 shared topicspoetry
62match
robertbyoungblood.com
Short Italian Poems by Robert B. Youngblood
1 shared topicspoetry
62match
fatherrejoice.com
Father Rejoice | wife, mother, writer, dreamer…
1 shared topicspoetry
62match
alanfranks.org
Alan Franks – Writer, Musician
1 shared topicspoetry
62match
andygaus.org
Andy Gaus | Songwriter, Poet & Author
1 shared topicspoetry
62match
maxbuckle.com
Max Buckle – Poet, Writer, Creative
1 shared topicspoetry
62match
angelhalo.biz
Placebo Addict
1 shared topicspoetry
62match
materialpoet.com
Material Poet
1 shared topicspoetry
62match
matwaala.com
MATWAALA - Home
1 shared topicspoetry
61match
ksmoore.com
K. S. Moore – Writer, Exploring Words and Nature.
1 shared topicspoetry
61match
theodorewaterfield.com
THEODORE WATERFIELD – We all have the same poet in us.
1 shared topicspoetry
61match
alapan.org
Alapan Abrittee Sangstha
1 shared topicspoetry
61match
feel-human-again.com
Home - Feel Human Again
1 shared topicspoetry
61match
thejungianaion.com
The Jungian Aion - Jungian Depth Psychology for a More Whole Life
1 shared topicspoetry
61match
andwhatshouldidoaboutit.com
And What Should I Do About It
1 shared topicspoetry
61match
benjamin-grossman.com
Benjamin Grossman « Starry-eyed Writer, Cautious Philosopher, Hopeful Romantic
1 shared topicspoetry
61match
gregbem.com
Greg Bem – Poet and Artist
1 shared topicspoetry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.