Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to intake-tracker.com

Intake Tracker · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
bergs.app
Protein Tracker
1 shared topicsnutrition
71match
intakeapp.app
INTAKE
1 shared topicsnutrition
70match
photocal.ai
PhotoCal: AI Calorie Tracker
1 shared topicsnutrition
70match
intake-online.com
Intake — The Most Simple Calorie & Macro Tracker
1 shared topicsnutrition
70match
soloeval.com
NutriTrack - Nutrition & Health Tracker
1 shared topicsnutrition
69match
piehole.ai
Piehole — AI-Powered Calorie Tracker
1 shared topicsnutrition
68match
intakelens.com
AI Nutrition Tracker - Photo, Voice & Meal Planning | IntakeLens
1 shared topicsnutrition
68match
pixorie.com
Pixorie – AI Calorie Tracker
1 shared topicsnutrition
68match
aical.net
FoodCal - AI Calorie Tracker
1 shared topicsnutrition
68match
sodiumtracker.com
Sodium Tracker - Track Your Daily Sodium Intake
1 shared topicsnutrition
68match
cmdmacros.com
CMDMacros - Smart Food & Macro Tracker
1 shared topicsnutrition
67match
4marks.app
Goals-First Food Tracker | Change Your Life
1 shared topicsnutrition
67match
sodio.app
Sodio - Salt & Sodium Tracker for iOS. Track Your Daily Intake.
1 shared topicsnutrition
67match
sodioapp.com
Sodio - Salt & Sodium Tracker for iOS. Track Your Daily Intake.
1 shared topicsnutrition
66match
0xcal.app
0xCal | AI Calorie & Macro Tracker for iPhone
1 shared topicsnutrition
66match
nextmeal.ai
NextMeal AI - Smart Meal Tracking
1 shared topicsnutrition
66match
nibblecal.com
AI Calorie Tracker — Snap Food Photos to Track Calories Instantly | NibbleCal
1 shared topicsnutrition
66match
body-minder.com
BodyMinder — AI-Powered Meal Planner & Nutrition Tracker
1 shared topicsnutrition

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.