similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to insomaniac.dev

insoman1ac (Anton Gorodchanin) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

iPPLab · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

iPPLab · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Invaryon · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

akshchand (Aksh) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

agileos · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

belcapp · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

kuroskin (Konstantin Uroskin) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

andrewhall (Andrew Hall) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

TheSamyar (Samyar_dsi) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

armedcodes · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

beepboop.digital

Beep Boop Digital · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

andrewbmccullough.com

andrewbmccullough (Andrew McCullough) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

faylite (Benjamin) · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

rsavin (Roman Savin) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

romanklimov.com

RomanKlimov (Roman) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

aaix (aidan) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

neuspaces · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Bludoo (Owen) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.