Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to ingsoftwarefesc.com

Portafolio FESC 2025 · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
ibrahimbadsha.com
Home | Basha Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
65match
nxtify.com
Nxtify Technologies Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
65match
chibertech312.com
PORTFOLIO | ChiBerTech312
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
65match
palakdwivedi.com
Professional Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
65match
axelgoh.com
Axel's Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
65match
oglemp.com
Personal Portfolio | Product Management & Technology
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
65match
afnanferdous.com
Portfolio - Md Afnan Ferdous
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
65match
sarahgucciardo.com
Sarah Gucciardo Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
65match
oscarbejas.com
Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
64match
ruixinoh.com
Rui Xin Oh - Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
64match
gilangsp.com
Gilang Satria Putra | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
64match
chasefenn.com
Chase Fenn Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
64match
onixytech.com
ONIXYTECH | PORTFOLIO
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
64match
5layersdeep.com
5 Layers Deep | Patent Portfolio & Deep-Tech Licensing
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
64match
albertgabay.com
Albert Gabay | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
64match
mschecter.com
Michael Schecter • Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
64match
shilpakartech.com
Shilpakar Tech LLP - Core Team & Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
64match
muhammad-umar.com
Dr. Muhammad Umar — Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.