similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to impulseforlearning.de

Impulseforlearning alternatives & similar sites

Sabine L. Schirlitz | New Media – Training Beratung — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Vocational Training →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
impulsemitneuenmedien.de ↗	85 match 1 shared topics	Sabine L. Schirlitz \| New Media – Training Beratung	DE de	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
impulse-for-learning.de ↗	85 match 1 shared topics	Sabine L. Schirlitz \| New Media – Training Beratung	DE de	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marketing-training-beratung.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Marketing Training Beratung	DE de	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctb-online.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	CTB - Training, Coaching und Beratung	de	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
juergenlohr.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Jürgen Lohr Training und Beratung	de	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hopfgartner-training.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	HOPFGARTNER TRAINING – Trainer · Coach · Mediator · Berater	DE de	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dbs-academy.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	DBS – Training & Consulting GmbH	de	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dbs-consulting.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	DBS – Training & Consulting GmbH	de	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	partial · 8
politiker-training.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Eiker Coaching – Politiker Training – Coaching, Training und Beratung	de	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jktraining.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	JK Training – JK Training	DE de	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ibe-training-beratung.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Willkommen - IBE Trainings- und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH	DE de	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hillmedia-training.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Hill Media Training - Medientraining & Kommunikation	DE de	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
haupt-coaching.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Training • Coaching • Mediation	de	vocational-training WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lanworks.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Lanworks AG – IT-Training & IT-Beratung für Ihre digitale Zukunft - Lanworks AG	DE de	vocational-training Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
arianesiegel.at ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Verkaufstraining Sprechtraining Rhetorik Pädagogik Beratung Stimme	AT de	vocational-training WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
die-wertschaetzer.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ausbildungskonzept Wertschätzungsbeauftragte.r \| DIE WERTSCHÄTZER \| Coaching – Beratung & Begleitung – Training	de	vocational-training Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
it-training-alliance.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	IT Training Alliance	DE de	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jms-training.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	JMS Training Website	DE de	vocational-training WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.