Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to imcquerrey.com

Ian McQuerrey · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
mustafasm.com
Hi, I'm Mustafa Said Mehmetoglu | Mustafa S. M.
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
justindeanfoster.com
Justin Foster
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
muchagato.dev
Tiago Muchagato
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
mufeezamjad.com
Mufeez Amjad
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
ademozd.com
Adem Ozdemir | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
lorenzinigiovanni.com
Giovanni Lorenzini
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
mpraveen.com
M Praveen | Senior Software Engineer — AI, Automation & Full-Stack
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
musegimicael.com
Muse Gimicael
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
juanpabloforero.com
Juan Pablo Forero
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
mrdehghan.com
Home | Mahmoud Reza Dehghan | mrdehghan
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
lukasniessen.com
Home | Lukas Niessen
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
bstefanski.com
Bart Stefanski — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
adityakhowal.com
Aditya Khowal
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
pablonz.com
AI Software Engineer | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
andrewting.dev
andrew ting
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
coryking.com
Cory King
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
criticaldeveloper.com
Criticaldeveloper — Tech solutions built with rigor
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
juanmanjarres.com
Juan Manjarres
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.