Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to imayakumar.com

Imaya Kumar Jagannathan · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
kirankbs.com
Kiran Kumar | Data Engineer
2 shared topicscloud-computing
66match
nathancote.dev
Nathan Cote
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
nathanmilot.com
Nathan Milot
2 shared topicscloud-computing
66match
nathanielmathew.com
Nathaniel Mathew
2 shared topicscloud-computing
65match
imharry404.com
Hariom Kumar - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
adilcan.me
Adil Can — Sr. Solutions Architect | Cloud Engineer
2 shared topicscloud-computing
65match
nathanojieabu.com
Portfolio | Nathan Ojieabu
2 shared topicscloud-computing
64match
imkumar.com
Kumar Abhishek | Software Architect | Personal website
2 shared topicscloud-computing
64match
kief.com
Kief Morris
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andreekurniawan.com
Andree Kurniawan - Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicscloud-computing
64match
estcharls.com
Carlos Soto | Software Engineer
2 shared topicscloud-computing
64match
ario.cloud
Nick Arellano - Automator, developer, and lifetime learner. - ARIO Cloud
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
nageshdn.com
NAGESH D N ·
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
ijharansari.com
Designing Scalable Systems for Real-World Impact
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
pcbaecker.com
Philipp C. Baecker
2 shared topicscloud-computing
63match
devopspolis.com
DevOpspolis - DevOps & Cloud Architecture Consulting
2 shared topicscloud-computing
63match
averymartell.com
Avery Martell
2 shared topicscloud-computing
63match
aws-sensei.cloud
AWS Sensei
2 shared topicscloud-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.