Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to imanqa.com

iman — notes from a test engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
devportalnotes.com
Notes from a Software Engineer | Dev Portal Notes
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
skorkuts.com
Software Engineer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
imabhinav.dev
Abhinav Singh | Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
aayushksharma.com
Yush — Software Engineer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
pedroni.dev
Lucas Pedroni - Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
manjuladube.com
Manjula Dube | Frontend Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
namoku.dev
Nando | Fullstack Engineer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
akshit.io
Akshit Kr Nagpal – Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
akshitkrnagpal.com
Akshit Kr Nagpal – Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
ikeba.dev
Illia Keba — Software Engineer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
angelreh.com
Ángel René Herrera Calzada - ICT Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
alexbenny.dev
Alex Benny | Software Engineer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
kiranadh.com
Kiran Adhikari - Backend Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
amir-aranibar.com
Backend Engineer Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
naman-anand.com
Naman Anand | Senior Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
testautomation.dev
Go Green Test Automation
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
ankeshgupta.tech
Ankesh Gupta | Software Engineer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
devoured.io
dvrd — Dan Castrillo's Engineering Blog
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.