Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to imancasso.com

Iman Sadeghi, Ph.D. · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
brxengineering.com
Brentan Alexander, Ph.D.
1 shared topicsscience
64match
adeelrazi.org
Adeel Razi, PhD
1 shared topicsscience
63match
juliane-mai.com
Juliane Mai, PhD
1 shared topicsscience
63match
atiqursunny.com
Home - Atiqur Rahman Sunny
1 shared topicsscience
63match
lullrb.com
Robert B. Lull, Ph.D. — Science Communication Scholar & Author
1 shared topicsscience
62match
buildem-materials.com
Paul W. Meyer, Ph.D. – A short website about Paul's research career
1 shared topicsscience
62match
madelinemckenna.com
Madeline McKenna – Ph.D. in Atmospheric Science
1 shared topicsscience
62match
cahust.org
Center for advanced human studies
1 shared topicsscience
62match
juliethebugologist.com
Julie A Reynolds, Ph.D. – Scientific Research, Communication, and Outreach
1 shared topicsscience
62match
byrdnick.com
Nick Byrd, Ph.D. | Using science and technology to understand and improve how we think.
1 shared topicsscience
62match
lowman-anatomy.com
Lowman Anatomy
1 shared topicsscience
62match
manuelacallari.com
Manuela Callari, PhD | Science and Medical Writer
1 shared topicsscience
62match
simonkaeppeli.com
Simon Kaeppeli, PhD – Simon Kaeppeli, PhD
1 shared topicsscience
62match
andrewbrownphd.com
Andrew W Brown, PhD
1 shared topicsscience
62match
magnethead494.com
Steven T. McDermott
1 shared topicsscience
62match
magnethead794.com
Steven T. McDermott
1 shared topicsscience
62match
abhrajeetroy.com
Abhrajeet V. Roy, PhD
1 shared topicsscience
62match
luisdramirez.com
Luis D. Ramirez, PhD
1 shared topicsscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.