Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to imaginationbr.com

Propósito - add-data · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
63match
phbrito.com
Pedro Brito — BI & Data Analyst
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
ritmodosdados.com
Ritmo dos Dados — Arquitetura de dados para empresas que medem o futuro
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
fatoranalytics.com
Home | Fator Analytics
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
a10br.com
Grupo IN | NowVertical
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
1msdigital.com
1MS Digital - Governança de Dados e Conhecimentos
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
pesquisainfos.com
PesquisaInfos - Consulta de Dados Públicos por CPF | Serviço Privado
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
rigueti.com
Bruno Rigueti Brandão | Análise de Dados
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
armandonetto.com
Armando Netto
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
integradordedados.com
Home - Blog do Integrador de Dados
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
neuron-db.com
NeuronDB — O Banco de Dados com IA Nativa
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
falxsystem.com
NeuroSaaS™ — Registro Público Canônico | FALX GLOBAL
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
fasttracksacademy.com
SQL Essencial por Apenas R$ 9,90!
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
clickdados.com
ClickDados - Gerador de Dados de Teste
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
kuipanalytics.com
Kuip Analytics | Data Improving Business – Sua parceira de Dados
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
pesquiseaqui.com
PesquiseAqui — Consultas Rápidas e Seguras
1 shared topicsdatabases
60match
af2statistics.com
AF2 Statistics
1 shared topicsdatabases
60match
farmadados.com
Farmadados | Inteligência em Dados
1 shared topicsdatabases
60match
nevesmind.dev
Matheus Neves da Silva - Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.