Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to imaginarywares.com

Imaginary Wares · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
the-game-capital.com
The Game Capital
1 shared topicscard-games
65match
4horsemencomics.com
Four Horsemen Comics and Gaming of Robinson Township
1 shared topicscard-games
65match
mainphasegaming.com
Home | Main Phase Gaming
1 shared topicscard-games
65match
manasync.io
ManaSync | Tournament Management Software
1 shared topicscard-games
65match
animetcg.net
Anime TCG.net
1 shared topicscard-games
65match
gocardex.com
Cardex — The Bloomberg Terminal for Trading Cards
1 shared topicscard-games
65match
manapool.com
The Market for Magic Cards - Mana Pool
1 shared topicscard-games
65match
pauperfall.com
Pauperfall - Magic: The Gathering Pauper Card Search
1 shared topicscard-games
65match
manaprobe.com
Manaprobe - A database of Magic: The Gathering Cards
1 shared topicscard-games
64match
1stcapitalgaming.com
1st Capital Gaming
1 shared topicscard-games
64match
1stcapitolgaming.com
1st Capital Gaming
1 shared topicscard-games
64match
manalotus.com
Magic: The Gathering Collection Manager · ManaLotus
1 shared topicscard-games
64match
animeimports.net
Anime Imports LLC
1 shared topicscard-games
64match
aviddgeektcg.com
Your Trusted Marketplace for Collectible Trading Card Games - TCGplayer
1 shared topicscard-games
64match
a2otcg.com
Your Trusted Marketplace for Collectible Trading Card Games - TCGplayer
1 shared topicscard-games
64match
manaspill.com
ManaSpill - The latest spoiled Magic: The Gathering cards.
1 shared topicscard-games
64match
maniadex.com
ManiaDex - Trading Card Game Shop
1 shared topicscard-games
64match
1collectiblesfab.com
1Collectibles - TCG
1 shared topicscard-games

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.