Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to imagicfoundation.com

Imagic Foundation · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
arfntri.com
AR FOUNDATION
1 shared topicsmedical-health
76match
the-sl-foundation.com
S|L Foundation
1 shared topicsmedical-health
75match
ayeshfoundation.org
AYESH FOUNDATION
1 shared topicsmedical-health
74match
ad-din.org
Ad-din Foundation
1 shared topicsmedical-health
73match
anpcarefoundation.org
ANP care Foundation
1 shared topicsmedical-health
73match
1stmedfoundation.com
First Med Foundation
1 shared topicsmedical-health
72match
aagamshreefoundation.org
Aagam Shree Foundation
1 shared topicsmedical-health
72match
kidneycarefoundation.com
Kidney Care Foundation
1 shared topicsmedical-health
72match
kidneycanada.com
The Kidney Foundation of Canada
1 shared topicsmedical-health
72match
abfmfoundation.org
About - ABFM Foundation
1 shared topicsmedical-health
71match
averafoundationevents.org
Login - Avera Foundation
1 shared topicsmedical-health
71match
betterprimarycare.com
Home | Foundation Health
1 shared topicsmedical-health
71match
acnesfoundation.org
American ACNES Foundation
1 shared topicsmedical-health
71match
alatarafoundation.org
Alatara Foundation - HOME
1 shared topicsmedical-health
71match
aavaamhospitalfoundation.com
Aavam Hospital Foundation
1 shared topicsmedical-health
71match
remiliyenfoundation.com
Remiliyen Foundation Trust
1 shared topicsmedical-health
70match
7summitsfoundation.org
Home | 7 Summits Foundation
1 shared topicsmedical-health
70match
aasldfoundation.org
Homepage | AASLD Foundation
1 shared topicsmedical-health

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.