Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ilikedatascience.com

Prakash's Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
arvindkumar-portfolio.com
Arvind's Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
72match
bhargavvaidya.com
Bhargav Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
70match
dframedata.com
Daniel Frame Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
69match
andrewborgeson.com
Andrew Borgeson Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
68match
awlovetest.net
Aubrey Love - Author Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
anhuynh.org
An Huynh · Data Science Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
gokulraja.com
Gokulraja - Data Engineer Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
andrewfindlay.io
Andrew Findlay | DuckDB SQL Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
chiannyu.com
Data Analyst Portfolio | Chiann-Yu Chen
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
devanshivtandel.com
Devanshi Tandel - Data Engineer Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
evaristomoreira.com
Portfolio - Evaristo Santos Soares Moreira
1 shared topicsdatabases
65match
narasimharoyal.com
Narasimha Royal | Data Engineer & Data Analyst Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
renaissanceportal.com
Renaissance Portal
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
bethelworldwidevi.com
friendly-firm-folio
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
abacusnbody.org
AbacusSummit Data Portal - Home
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
ignaciobustillo.com
Ignacio Bustillo - DataScience por dokier
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
chattadata.org
ChattaData: Chattanooga's Open Data Portal
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
betwinx.com
Banner Reporting
1 shared topicsdatabases

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.