Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ijparker.com

IJ Parker Home Page · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
sionliscannor.com
Home Page
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
74match
anneosterlund.com
Home Page
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
74match
kipromie.com
Home Page
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
cherbonfis.com
Cher Bonfis Home Page
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
aarontravis.net
Aaron Travis Home Page
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
alexfeinman.net
Fine Fiction - Home Page
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
andreagillies.com
Andrea Gillies: Home Page
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
bewightman.com
B.E. Wightman Author Home Page
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
andrewbowie.net
Home Page - ANDREW BOWIE
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
bewilderingstories.com
Bewildering Stories home page
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
denisearnault.com
Home Page - Personal Website
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
archerswift.com
archerswift.com Home Page - Website
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
annalisacrawford.com
ANNALISA CRAWFORD, AUTHOR - Home Page
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
paulsergent.com
Home - Home
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
alexparkerpublishing.com
Alex Parker Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
nadia-ayesha.com
Home - Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
charlemagnefiles.com
charlemagnefiles.com Home Page - Website
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
adirondackbooksonline.com
home page - Adirondack Authors
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.