Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ijcrd.com

Welcome to IJCRD Journals · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
labquip.co.uk 🇬🇧
Welcome to Labquip
1 shared topicsscience
68match
ecologiea.com
Welcome to Ecolog:IEA | Ecolog:IEA
1 shared topicsscience
67match
brucelindbloom.com
Welcome to Bruce Lindbloom's Web Site
1 shared topicsscience
67match
4dinternationaljournal.com
Home - 4D International Journal
1 shared topicsscience
66match
cambiodesign.org
Crassulacean Acid Metabolism Project | Welcome to AM
1 shared topicsscience
66match
aaas-sectionu.org
Welcome to Section U of the AAAS! - AAAS - Section U
1 shared topicsscience
65match
rebeccalalk.com
Welcome Page - Rebecca Lalk
1 shared topicsscience
65match
asfirj.org
ASFI Research Journal - Home
1 shared topicsscience
65match
creationcenters.com
Welcome! - CreationCenters.com
1 shared topicsscience
65match
multidisciplines.com
Home - Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences
1 shared topicsscience
65match
jurnalsupernova.com
Supernova Science Education Journal
1 shared topicsscience
64match
sis-group.org.uk 🇬🇧
Welcome - Society for Interdisciplinary Studies
1 shared topicsscience
64match
recentscientific.com
IJRSR Journal-UGC guidelines journal |
1 shared topicsscience
64match
aaps-journal.org
The Journal of Paleontological Sciences
1 shared topicsscience
64match
jsaer.com
Home - Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research
1 shared topicsscience
64match
aasjournal.org
The Journal of the Alabama Academy of Science
1 shared topicsscience
64match
jsciencetech.com
JScienceTech - The Journal of Science and Technology
1 shared topicsscience
63match
akwapolyjournal.org
Akwapoly Journal of Communication & Scientific Research
1 shared topicsscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.