Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ifs-scale.com

The IFS Scale · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
annaworthingtontherapy.com
Anna Worthington Therapy - Personalised Therapy
1 shared topicsmental-health
65match
mbtityper.com
MBTItyper - Personality insights that feel personal
1 shared topicsmental-health
65match
aim-store.net
The Aim Store – Quality Products for Hypnosis
1 shared topicsmental-health
64match
fasterscaleapp.com
The Unofficial Faster Scale App | Welcome
1 shared topicsmental-health
64match
ironcouch.com
THE IRON COUCH - Iron Couch
1 shared topicsmental-health
64match
themoodjourney.com
Mood
1 shared topicsmental-health
63match
interpersonalclinic.com
Home - The Interpersonal Therapy Clinic
1 shared topicsmental-health
63match
sophiepalmstierna.com
Home - SophiePalmstierna
1 shared topicsmental-health
63match
beyond-boundaries-rt.com
BEYONDBOUNDARIES
1 shared topicsmental-health
63match
mbtitime.com
mbtitime
1 shared topicsmental-health
63match
sophieheloisebennett.com
Sophie Bennett
1 shared topicsmental-health
63match
intuitionpsychology.com
The Intuition Psychology
1 shared topicsmental-health
63match
iordachedragos.com
Iordache Dragoș
1 shared topicsmental-health
63match
themind-spa.com
The Mind Spa
1 shared topicsmental-health
63match
thepersonamind.com
Persona Mind | Advanced Ecosystem for Psychological Wellbeing
1 shared topicsmental-health
63match
inspirethroughra.com
Inspire through RA – The raw reality of my life
1 shared topicsmental-health
63match
newcognitions.com
New Cognition LLC
1 shared topicsmental-health
63match
themonkeyoffcoach.com
The Monkey Off Coach
1 shared topicsmental-health

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.