similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to ifandwhen.org

Ifandwhen alternatives & similar sites

If and When | Writing from inside the machine. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Artificial Intelligence →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
stackorqueue.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Writing Portfolio \| Writing Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bloodinthemachine.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Blood in the Machine \| Brian Merchant \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
faizamalik.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Faiza Malik \| AI & Machine Learning Portfolio	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
distill.pub ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Distill — Latest articles about machine learning	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oneaibase.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Latest AI Trends & Machine Learning Insights \| ONE Ai BASE	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ata.network ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Automata - Verifiable machines for Web3 and AI	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
omninovaaionline.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	OmniNovaAI Online - Innovating the Future	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rendraft.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Rendraft — AI Writing Assistant for the Web	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
1chipml.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	GitHub - 1chipML/1chipML: a library for numerical crunching and machine learning on microcontrollers · GitHub	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bartwronski.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Bart Wronski \| Technology, programming, art, machine learning, image and signal processing	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anirudhchauhan.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Anirudh Chauhan \| Machine Learning Engineer	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
springcode.dev ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	SpringCode — Field notes from auditing AI-built apps	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dorianbrown.dev ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Dorian Brown – Finding signal and escaping the noise	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anthropora.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Anthropora - "Start by Changing Yourself, Then Change the World"	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
broctic.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Broctic — Building for the AI Singularity	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reloc.io ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Pulse joins the Mozilla family to help develop a new approach to machine learning	en	technology-and-computing Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cryptoscript.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	cryptoScript Insights and News	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
developersguide.ai ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	The Developer's Guide to AI: From Prompts to Agents	en	artificial-intelligence Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.