similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to iamvalev.com

Iamvalev alternatives & similar sites

Ivan Valev — GTM & Sales Leader — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Executive Leadership And Management →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
p3firm.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Ben Chaib \| Revenue Growth & Sales Turnaround Leadership \| CRO & VP Sales	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agenticgtmleaders.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Agentic GTM Leaders	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
achillesleadership.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Home - Achilles Leadership	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5eaglesleadership.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	5 Eagles Leadership	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
christophe-menard.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Christophe Ménard — Executive Technology Sales Leader \| CCO · CRO · VP Sales	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
9lensleadership.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	9 Lens Leadership	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
minds-senses.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Sales & Leadership Coaching in Asia - Minds & Senses	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress Lightspeed	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chepbeerdallas.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Recruiting, Sales Management and Leadership Playbook	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
academiedesleaders.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Académie des Leaders	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ianmuirhead.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	DesignPulse — Ian Muirhead \| Product & Design Leadership	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
idoyoram.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Ido Yoram — Executive Leader \| AI Energy · SaaS · EMS	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kurspahic.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Tarik Kurspahić — Engineering & Product Leader	US~ en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
paalbraathen.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Pål Bråthen — Executive Leader & CEO	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
agustin-sanchez.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Agustin Sanchez — Design Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ladieswholeader.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Ladies who Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robertbudde.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	R.J. Budde \| Operations Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rohitbassi.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Rohit Bassi Global Keynote Speaker for Leaders, Sales & Teams	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
roitalks.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Rohit Bassi Global Keynote Speaker for Leaders, Sales & Teams	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.