Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to iamnick.dev

iamnick.dev | Full stack developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
85match
gericrroj.com
Geri Crroj | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
84match
ajesh.dev
Ajesh DS | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
84match
ceradev.com
Ceradev | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
84match
rupeshvirani.com
Rupesh | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
83match
eraygulveren.com
Eray | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
83match
sarah-salvatore.com
Sarah Salvatore | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
83match
iamalibaig.com
Ali Baig - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
ayanhedayati.com
Ayan Hedayati - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
aaldrin.dev
Aldrin Arabis | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
akar-ali.com
Akar Imdad | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
iamshukhrat.com
Shukhrat Mamadaliev | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
ahmadbajwa.dev
Ahmad Ali | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
sooryan.dev
Sooryan K | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
ahsan-rasheed.com
Muhammad Ahsan Rasheed | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
anasbenani.dev
Anas Benani | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
meaydin.com
Mehmet Aydın - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
anasbelbaz.com
Anas | Full stack developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
ahmedelbilal.com
Ahmed | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.