Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to iamed.dev

Iamed - Frontend Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
berkegunes.dev
Berke Mehmed - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
nxndi.com
Nxndi - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andersonmalheiro.com
Anderson - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
noye-dev.com
noye | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
onuraydin.dev
Onur Aydin - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
aakashpai.com
Aakash Pai - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
erikkimsey.com
Erik Kimsey - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
dennisalves.com
Dennis Alves - Frontend developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
nickstaroba.com
Nick Staroba - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ruhichandra.com
Ruhi Chandra - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ercovi.dev
Èric Corbí - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
opeabiodun.com
0pedev · Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
nurdanvayni.com
Nurdan — Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
onigirinik.com
Nikita — Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
georgina.dev
Georgina / Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ossamaelabbady.com
Ossama Elabbady - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
avastack.dev
Ava Stack | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ericcwong.com
Eric Wong | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.