Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to hugopalmar.com

Hugo Palmar – Visual Artist · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
kaltumegana.com
Kaltume Gana - Visual Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
71match
ali-gillani.com
Ali Gillani — Visual Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
70match
bertmonterona.com
Bert Monterona - Visual Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
69match
alicebaillaud.com
Alice Baillaud – Plasticienne / visual artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
68match
alicenaegel.com
Alice Naegel — Contemporary Visual Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
68match
sara-khan.com
Sara Khan | Visual Artist - Official Website
2 shared topicsfine-art
68match
bertbergen.com
Artist – Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
67match
alisonharperartist.com
Alison Harper – Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
67match
sarv-farid.com
Vancouver Visual Artist Sarv Farid: Art & Connection
2 shared topicsfine-art
67match
hmlartist.com
HML Artist – Art Collections
2 shared topicsfine-art
66match
alisonljones.com
Alison Jones – Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
66match
maiyap.com
MaiYap - Visual Art Portfolio | MaiYap Art
2 shared topicsfine-art
66match
sarahkushwara.com
Sarah Kushwara – Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
66match
hamillpaintings.com
Ruth Hamill Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
66match
alicepickering.com
Alice Pickering – Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
66match
hishani.com
Hishani De Silva visual art | Toronto Artist – Acrylic Ice Technique | HishaniART
2 shared topicsfine-art
66match
sarahgordonart.com
Sarah Gordon Art – Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
66match
hannahxrichards.com
HANNAH RICHARDS - hannah richards | visual art
2 shared topicsfine-art

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.