Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to hrdive.com

HR News and Analysis | HR Dive · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
40match
medtechdive.com
Medical Technology News | MedTech Dive
2 co-citations9 shared techbiotech-and-biomedical-industry
39match
grocerydive.com
Grocery News | Grocery Dive
2 co-citations9 shared techfood-industry
38match
fashiondive.com
Fashion & Apparel News | Fashion Dive
2 co-citations9 shared techapparel-industry
35match
hub-scale.com
Hubscale | Growth Platform for Cybersecurity and AI Vendors
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryhuman-resources
35match
executive-payroll.com
Executivepayroll | Servicios Administracion de planilla
1 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryhuman-resources
35match
cstoredive.com
Convenience Store News | C-Store Dive
2 co-citations9 shared techretail-industry
35match
c-storedive.com
Convenience Store News | C-Store Dive
2 co-citations9 shared techretail-industry
35match
thetechrecruiters.com
TTR — The Tech Recruiters | Blockchain, AI, Fintech & SaaS Talent
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryhuman-resources
34match
avrioai.com
AVRIO AI | Autonomous Hiring Infrastructure
1 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categoryhuman-resources
34match
hrgeckos.com
HR Geckos™ - Meet your copilot for HR operations!
1 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryhuman-resources
34match
crewmojo.com
Crewmojo: Personalize & automate HR workflows
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryhuman-resources
34match
lauber-partners.com
Milwaukee Fractional CFOs & Interim Services | Lauber Business
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryexecutive-leadership-and-management

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.