similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to holzscheiter.com

Holzscheiter alternatives & similar sites

Clemens Holzscheiter – // Übersetzungen Japanisch > Deutsch — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Publishing Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
deutsche-spezialmedien.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Verlag Deutsche Spezialmedien - Startseite	de	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
academic-translate.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Übersetzungsbüro Toptranslation \| Angebot in 30 Min. \| Übersetzungsagentur für Fachtexte	de	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
context-media.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Context-Verlag Deutscher Hochschulverlag	DE de	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dav-medien.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Mediengruppe Deutscher Apotheker Verlag - MDAV	DE de	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 13
d-indexer.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Willkommen — Deutsches Netzwerk der Indexer	de	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
compliance-berater.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Aboshop - Deutscher Fachverlag - Recht und Wirtschaft	DE de	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
streifbandzeitung.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Streifbandzeitung für Pressepost \| Deutsche Post \| Presse Distribution	de	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
missuppercover.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	missuppercover – Premium Premade Covers	de	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
childadx.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Publisher-Partner finden \| Zertifizierter Publisher-Partner – Google	de	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
capri-medien.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Startseite – AC medienhaus	DE de	publishing-industry TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deal-operations.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Homepage - DE – DEAL Konsortium	DE de	publishing-industry Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mintloop.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	mintloop — KI-Lösungen für Verlage	de	publishing-industry	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4-press.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	4PRESS - Bindeglied zwischen Verlagen & Presse-Einzelhandel	de	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
mm-digitalmedia.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - MM-Digitalmedia – Digitale Medien, Bücher und Musik	de	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
business-bestseller.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	business bestseller - Buchzusammenfassungen \| Bücher \| Seminare	DE de	publishing-industry WordPress Lightspeed	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
round-not-square.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Round not Square – Verlag für Buchrollen	de	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catbooks.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Catbooks Lizenzagentur - Kater Literaturverlag	DE de	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
corporatebooks.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Koehler Mittler Corporate Books – TAMM Media	DE de	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.