Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to hofpartner.com

Rullaxlar, Chuckar & Smarta Lyfthjälpmedel | Hofpartner AB · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
48match
a-plast.com
Hem - A-plast
2 co-citations4 shared techmanufacturing-industry
45match
axipto.com
Hem - Axipto
2 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorymanufacturing-industry
44match
awexia.com
Awexia | Rekrytering - Executive Search - Interim Management
2 co-citations4 shared techhuman-resources
44match
hsfgroup.com
HEM - HSF Group
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorymanufacturing-industry
43match
metalpowdergroup.com
Metal Powder Group - Homepage - Metal Powder Group
2 co-citations3 shared techmetals-industry
43match
allenakonsult.com
Allena Konsult | Copywriter, projektledare och marknad
2 co-citations3 shared techmarketing-and-advertising
42match
dahlmans.com
Dahlmans Kylteknik | En del av NCG
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorymechanical-and-industrial-engineering-industry
42match
elkoll.com
Elkoll – Installation, Felsökning, Projektering, Drift & Service
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorymechanical-and-industrial-engineering-industry
41match
chmanalytics.com
Hållbarhetskonsult - Rådgivning & Redovisning - CHM Analytics
2 co-citations2 shared techmanagement-consulting-industry
40match
haas-sweden.com
Edströms - Verktyg, service och maskiner - Edströms
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymechanical-and-industrial-engineering-industry
40match
allguren.com
Jonathan Allgurén Portfolio
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymechanical-and-industrial-engineering-industry
40match
a3cert.com
ISO Certifiering för alla branscher - A3CERT
2 co-citations3 shared techbusiness-operations

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.