Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to hmjackson.com

Matthew Jackson · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
mpharrigan.com
Matthew Harrigan
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
mtmatthews.com
Michael Matthews
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
palkimas.com
Matthew Palkimas | Senior SDE at AWS
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
mplappert.com
Matthias Plappert
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
mplappert.io
Matthias Plappert
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
andrewjesson.com
andrew jesson
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
agent-planner.com
Agent Planner | Research-Backed AI Agent System Design
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
creativemachinas.com
Creative Machinas | Justin Matthews | Substack
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
siruixie.com
Sirui Xie
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
2guysnai.com
2 Guys and AI | Custom AI Agents & Workflows | Jacksonville, FL
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
pack-snap.com
PackSnap
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
alexwei.org
Alex Wei · Home
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
funnelboss.com
Jackson Yew - AI Implementation Builder for Founder-Led Teams
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
junjieye.com
Junjie Ye
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
andyharbert.com
Andy Harbert | AI & Technology Consultant — Jacksonville & Northeast Florida
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
mribero.com
Profile | Mónica Ribero Díaz
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
simonpopham.com
Simon Popham
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
agentrift.tech
AgentRift — AI Talent Atlas
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.