similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to historyofthebutton.com

Historyofthebutton alternatives & similar sites

History of the Button — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
roadandcode.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Road & Code - A story of digital nomad	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rootonicle.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	rootonicle.com - Enchanting Hearts through In-Depth Exploration of the digital world and technology.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
futuretech1.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	FutureTech – Exploring the future of technology	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trapontech.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Trap On Tech – The trap of the future technology	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rnalexander.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Ryan's little corner of the web	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
techmanity.co.uk ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Techmanity \| Exploring the human aspects of technology	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
backroomecho.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Echo in the Backroom	en	technology-and-computing Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
storycloudstudio.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Story Cloud Studio	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kylemoser.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Helping you get the most of time and technology	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rotemgaloz.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Cirrus Minor - The nexus of technology, business & people	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
developersalliance.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Developers Alliance - The Voice of Developers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
devalliance.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Developers Alliance - The Voice of Developers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
devalliance.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Developers Alliance - The Voice of Developers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ida-usa.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Institute of Digital Anthropology \| Exploring Humanity in the Digital Age	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ownthecompute.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Who Will Own the Infrastructure of the Future?	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chrisrz.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Hello there - chrisrz	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 20
l2beat.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	L2BEAT - The state of the layer two ecosystem	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designhigher.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Designhigher - Choose the hardware that wins the benchmark .	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.