similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to historyofdatascience.com

Historyofdatascience alternatives & similar sites

History of Data Science — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Artificial Intelligence →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
aurasciences.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Aura Sciences Inc.	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vorithm.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Vorithm - Ace Your Data Science Interviews	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gaurangkakade.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Gaurang Kakade \| Data Science & Machine Learning	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
introdatascience.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	INTRODUCTION TO DATA SCIENCE - The Book	en	artificial-intelligence Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skafahad.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	SK Ahammad Fahad - AI Researcher & Data Science Leader	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
data2action.eu ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Datavysts \| Rebooting data science to build a better future	European Union en	artificial-intelligence WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vortex-data.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Vortex Data & AI \| Data Science & AI for Enterprise	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
interact-space.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Interactive Space - Medical Data Science & AI Research	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neeladrishekharpal.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Neeladri Shekhar Pal — Lead Data Scientist	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
gauriai.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Gauri AI – Best AI & Data Science Services Provider for Smart Solutions	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
data-logistics.eu ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Numbers and Neurons \| Data Science for Students	European Union en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
intellerts.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Intellerts - Experts in Data Science and Artificial Intelligence	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lmfhubtech.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Lucas Meneghesso Faria - Data Scientist/AI Engineer	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lmgibson.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Data Science, Analytics, and Causal Inference	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
astewaykebede.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Asteway Kebede - Data Scientist \| Forecasting & AI Applications	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
interactiondatalab.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Interaction Data Lab – Network science for collective intelligence	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neilandrew.dev ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Neil Olson \| Agronomist & Data Scientist	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sitdsail.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Data Science & AI Lab at Singapore Institute of Singapore	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.