similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to hexasec.cloud

Hexasec alternatives & similar sites

HexaSec | PCI DSS Compliance & iGaming Systems Engineering — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
dotimg.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	SSE – Secure Systems Engineering	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
3accents.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Three Accents Consulting LLC \| C4 & Cyber Systems Engineering (SDVOSB)	United States~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
abetech.live ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Abraham Lora — IT Systems Engineer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
icalia.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	ICALIA SYSTEMS - Security Engineering & Red Team	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cloudyday.tech ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Compliance & Infosec	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trigosec.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	trigosec: engineering for trust-critical systems	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
abnerpallichan.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Abner Pallichan \| Security Systems Engineer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaronjohns.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Aaron Johns \| Systems Engineer & Security Leader	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ciolek.dev ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Jakub Ciolek - cloud security, system engineering and compilers	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abrahamkhan.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Abraham Khan \| Computer Engineering Student - Real-Time Systems, Embedded & Data	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aarongalipeau.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Aaron Galipeau - Systems Engineer & Infrastructure Architect	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stofu.io ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	SToFU Systems \| Cybersecurity, Security Certification, and Systems Engineering	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eagledefensesys.tech ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Eagle Defense Systems \| Cybersecurity & CMMC Compliance Solutions	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
detectionengineering.io ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Detection Engineering Maturity Matrix	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chriskoucheki.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Chris Koucheki \| Product Compliance & Security Leader	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
minkyc.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	MinKYC \| Privacy-Preserving Compliance Infrastructure	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
assuritysystems.co.uk ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Assurity Systems \| Cyber Security Re-engineered	United Kingdom en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
d-cryptor.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Cybersecurity \| ST Engineering	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.