Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to herdanang.com

a Bookish Journal · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
a5journal.com
A5 Journal
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
angsanabooks.com
Angsana Books
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
angsanabookstore.com
Angsana Books
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
aaabooksunlimited.com
AAA Books Unlimited Page
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
geniusbookz.com
Genius Books
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
kritisbooks.com
Kritis Books
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
plutojournals.com
Open Access Social Science Journals - Pluto Journals
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
krcbooks.com
KRC Books - Home
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
becomingmebooks.com
Becoming Me Books
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
rinosolbergbooks.com
Rino Solberg Books
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
garageofbooks.com
The Garage of Books
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
helensbooksandbiz.com
Helens Books and Biz
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
plsbookworks.com
Home - PLS Bookworks
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
7dayauthor.com
How to Write and Publish Your Own Books
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
plasujalis.com
PLASU Journal of Archival, Library and Information Science (PLASUJALIS)
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
shipyourbooks.com
ShipYourBooks.com – Ship Your Books
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
cambabooks.com
Camba Books – Inspiring you for life
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
dmrstech.com
My Book Showroom — Pricing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.