Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to heravi.dev

Mohammad Heravi · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
sweidan.dev
Mohamad Ali Soueidan
1 shared topicsrobotics
67match
mohamednabail.com
Mohamed Nabail
1 shared topicsrobotics
66match
mohammedfarah.com
Mohammed Farah | Portfolio
1 shared topicsrobotics
66match
mohammadmemon.com
Mohammad Ibrahim Memon | Robotics Engineer
1 shared topicsrobotics
66match
mohammedazab.com
Mohammed Azab | Mechatronics Engineering Student
1 shared topicsrobotics
66match
mahnazmohammadkarimi.com
Mahnaz Mohammad Karimi — Robotics Engineer & Product Designer
1 shared topicsrobotics
65match
pramadito.com
Muhammad Pramudito's Portfolio
1 shared topicsrobotics
65match
shivamwalia.com
Shivam Walia
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
mofouda.com
Mohamed Fouda
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
andrecox.io
Andre Cox | Mechanical Engineering Student & Robotics Specialist
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
hermes-eng.com
Hermes Engineering: Automation and Software Development Experts | Hermes Engineering
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
monashautomation.com
Monash Automation
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
cadenpage.com
Caden Page | Robotics Research and Engineering
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
monroekennedy3.com
Monroe Kennedy III – Mechanical Engineer, Roboticist
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
diysarvesh.com
Sarvesh Vichare | Robotics & Autonomous Systems Engineer
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
7tho.com
Working Hard Here!!
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
andy-drago.com
Anthony Drago - Personal Website
1 shared topicsrobotics
64match
andreasli.com
Andreas Li — Mechatronics & Robotics Engineer
1 shared topicsrobotics

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.