Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to heldm.com

My Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
85match
caleecs.com
My Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
plumega.com
GP's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
garethdean.dev
Gareth Dean Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
hemab.dev
Hema's Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
andriyoga.com
Andri Yoga | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
andresevaldez.com
Andres Valdez Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
calebpitts.com
Caleb Pitts | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
ethanreese.com
Ethan Reese - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
anasalakkad.com
Anas Alakkad | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
moonhellal.com
Moonhellal — Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
pixelhacker.com
pixelhacker :: portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
itayolivcovitz.com
Itay Olivcovitz Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
rigelleonard.com
Rigel Leonard - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
connor-madigan.com
Connor Madigan | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
antonedei.com
Antonedei Otoro - Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
cameron-salazar.dev
Cameron Salazar - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
mohamedmoselhy.com
Mohamed Moselhy | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
mostafaomidi.com
Mostafa Omidi — Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.