similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to hekstra.org

Hekstra alternatives & similar sites

Thoughts to Share – Thoughts on Hardware and Software Development — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
douggrubba.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Doug Grubba – Software and game development posts.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chinhdo.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Chinh Do - Chinh's semi-random thoughts on software development, gadgets, and other things.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chiefey.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Digital Nomad – Software Development on the Go	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
badjano.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Games, Apps, AI and IOT software development	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
backpointer.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	backpointer.com — Thoughts & experiences in every day software development	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robertohuertas.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Software Development \| Roberto Huertas	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stolbovsky.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Andrey Stolbovsky - Software Development Manager	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dominativ.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Most Important Software and Developers – Dominativ	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dominiklabs.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Tech Blog \| Code, Software Development & Electronics	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamcthompson.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Adam C Thompson - Software Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doubleucook.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Will Cook - Software Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eoszak.me ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Eric's SharedPoints - Posts and ramblings about SharePoint, software development, fishing and other things I thought were cool	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adampisula.tech ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Adam Pisula \| Software Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
doulastudios.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Doula Studios — Hardware Product Development	en	technology-and-computing Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robcardy.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Rob Cardy — Software Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
advaitaamrit.tech ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Advaita Amrit - Software Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
icreatewebdesign.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Clear Software – All About Software, Hardware & Eccommerce	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
strategy4ai.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Expert Tech Partner for Scalable Software Development \| Veroke	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.