Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to heimansm.com

Loomis House, LLC · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
knpublishinghouse.com
KN Publishing House
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
henhousepublishing.com
Hen House Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
esatto.io
Esatto, LLC
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
nuvantahouse.com
Nuvanta House Publisher
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
coolbirdstudios.com
CoolBird Publishing House
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
hfgroup.com
HF Group, LLC
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
rhpodcast.com
Home - Random House Books
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
rhpublishinggroup.com
Home - Random House Books
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
rhreadinggroup.com
Home - Random House Books
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
rhtrade.com
Home - Random House Books
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
rhliterary.com
Round House Literary Agency
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
shemergencehouse.com
SHEMERGENCE HOUSE PUBLISHING
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
dlpublications.com
Research Hub - Publishing House
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
ishmaeltree.com
Publishing House - Ishmael Tree
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
islandhousepress.com
Home — Island House Press
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
monniesmobile.com
Monnie's Mobile Office, LLC
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
odopublishing.com
ODO Publishing House - Publisher
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
knopfspeakersbureau.com
Penguin Random House Speakers Bureau
1 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.