similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to hegenbarth.com

Michael Hegenbarth · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

heuristicsecurity.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Michael Brouwer

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Michael Brouwer

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Michael Brouwer

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Michael Brouwer

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Michael Brouwer

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Michael Brouwer

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Michael Brouwer

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Michael Brouwer

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Michael Brouwer

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

contimichael.com

Michael Conti, PhD · URI Computer Science

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

gammonsportfolio.com

Michael Gammons | Cybersecurity Portfolio & IT Compliance Expert

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

compnetchicago.com

Daniel Helma | Cybersecurity

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

ismaelmuhammad.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

policytrail.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

ismyidleaky.com

Is my ID leaky?

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.