Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to hazelbase.com

Hazelbase · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
100match
hazelbase.io
Hazelbase
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising
70match
mailbeast.ai
MailBeast - AI-Powered Cold Email & Deliverability Platform
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising
67match
manfarang.com
Manfarang — AI-Powered Lead Generation | Manfarang
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorysales
67match
moblevate.com
Moblevate | Programmatic Advertising Platform in Dubai
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryadvertising-industry
67match
mollydaines.com
Molly Daines | Luxury Brand Strategist
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising
67match
itooldelta.com
Tooldelta
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising
67match
annayasinska.com
Anna Yasinska — Junior Digital Marketing Specialist
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising
65match
metricsflow.com
Ahoora
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising
65match
monlix.com
Monlix - App Monetization
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising
65match
grocerfolk.com
Grocer Folk — Instacart & Retail Media for CPG Brands
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising
65match
hasnaatebbai.com
Hasnaa Tebbai
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising
65match
itappens.ai
itappens.ai | Global GEO & AEO Consultancy for B2B SaaS
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.