Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to hazel.ai

Hazel · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
36match
myverdant.com
Tax & Accounting // Omaha, NE - Avior Wealth Management
5 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryfinancial-planning
34match
noblewealthsolutions.com
Home | Noble Wealth Solutions
4 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryfinancial-planning
34match
gtaxwealth.com
Home | Generations Tax and Wealth Management
5 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryfinancial-planning
34match
guardianfinancefltax.com
Home | Guardian Finance LLC
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorypersonal-taxes
34match
halewealthplanning.com
Mark Hale of Navigon Financial Group | Financial Services | Retirement Planning | Life Insurance | Disability Insurance
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorylife-insurance
32match
guylandolfi.com
Home | Guy J. Landolfi CPA, CFP
3 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryfinancial-planning
32match
anlikerfinancial.com
Integrated Wealth & Tax | Glen Allen, VA | Anliker Financial Management
3 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryfinancial-planning
32match
mac-ca.com
Home | MAC LLP
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorypersonal-taxes
32match
advisor-finder.com
AdvisorFinder - Find Your Financial Advisor Today
6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryfinancial-planning
32match
darvisaccounting.com
Welcome to Rick Darvis Accounting
4 co-citations2 shared categoryfinancial-planning
32match
antarescpas.com
Account for Anything™ | Aprio
3 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorypersonal-taxes
31match
gregsalvatore.com
Greg Salvatore, CPA, CEPA®
3 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryfinancial-planning

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.