similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to hayeditorial.com

Hayeditorial alternatives & similar sites

Hay Editorial proofreading and editing — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Publishing Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
sanderlingeditorial.com ↗	79 match 1 shared topics	Sanderling Editorial \| Copyediting and proofreading	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
editor.ae ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Editor UAE: Certified Proofreading and Editing Company in Dubai	AE en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
bookeditingservices.co.uk ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Book Editing Services UK \| Book Editor \| Proofreading Service	GB en	publishing-industry Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nativeenglishedit.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Native English Editing and Proofreading	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
urbanaediting.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Urbana Editing - PhD Thesis Proofreading Services \| Urbana Editing	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acestt.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Ayana Chester Editing Services (ACES) - Copy Editing and Proofreading, Trinidad and Tobago - Home	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ajcollins.com.au ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Book Editing Beta Reading Proofreading Manuscript Assessments	AU en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
falconediting.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Scientific Editing, Proofreading and Translation Services	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luckyauthor.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	LUCKY AUTHOR – professional book editing and other editorial services	en	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acbproofreading.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	ACB Proofreading - Home	en	publishing-industry Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
planetproofreading.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	ESL Academic Editing & Proofreading \| Planet Proofreading	en	publishing-industry Weebly WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
proofwise.co.uk ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Proof Wise Proofreading Service – Welcome to Proof Wise	GB en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carolinehoggedits.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Editing \| Caroline Hogg	en	publishing-industry Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jmreditors.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Expert Academic Writing and Editing Services for Researchers \| JMR Editors	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shakspeareservices.co.uk ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Editing, proofreading, designing, self-publishing, websites	GB en	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
axiomediting.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Axiom Editing	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lyndensproofreading.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Lynden's Proofreading \| Professional Proofreader, Hobart Tasmania	AU~ en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nancy-egan.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Nancy Egan, PhD – Editorial and Language Services	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.