Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to havenstadworks.com

. · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
65match
julienlebail.com
JLB
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
65match
jinglhuang.com
J.H
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
65match
hawaiianarchitecture.com
VP
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
65match
aronjensen.com
A.J
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
65match
8plusdesign.com
8+
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
58match
apostrophekin.com
Kin
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
58match
bokalandsneed.com
BSA
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
58match
fengdesignstudio.com
Ge
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
55match
matthiasalbold.com
|
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
50match
jenkindigital.com
Jenkin Digital Graphic Design
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
50match
joelarnoldcreative.com
JDA Experiential | Discover Creative Solutions Today
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
50match
julhick.com
Julean Hickenlooper
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
50match
juleswilde.com
JULES WILDE
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
50match
kangyouru.com
Ada Kang _ (Kangyouru)
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
50match
kellenhatanaka.com
Kellen Hatanaka
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
50match
kendaljones.com
Kendal Jones
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
50match
kennediknudsen.com
Kennedi Knudsen
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
50match
keonsaghari.com
Keon Saghari
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.