Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to hapascrt.com

HAPA Security · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
nitrasecurity.com
Nitra Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
78match
nitra.app
Nitra Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
78match
mcp-security.com
MCP Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
77match
grsecurity.com
grsecurity
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
77match
grsecurity.net
grsecurity
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
77match
grsecurity.org
grsecurity
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
77match
cmcsec.com
CMC Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
77match
rodseclabs.com
IT/Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
77match
absec.org
AB Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
77match
3qsecurity.io
3Q Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
77match
3qsecurity.com
3Q Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
77match
fdsecuritygroup.com
FD Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
77match
ns-security.co.uk 🇬🇧
NS Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
77match
securityblues.co.uk 🇬🇧
Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
76match
arielsecurity.com
Ariel Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
76match
node-security.com
Node Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
76match
nitrosecurityllc.com
Nitro security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
76match
ssgsecurity.co.uk 🇬🇧
SSG Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.