similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to hannabush.com

Hannabush alternatives & similar sites

Hanna Bush – Technical writer, knowledge manager, librarian, designer, editor. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Freelance Writing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
samanthamoorewrites.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Samantha Writes Moore – Technical Writer, Copy Editor, Journalist	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joseoayala.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Jose O. Ayala – Technical Writer/Copywriter	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jodiebaer.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Jodie Baer. Technical writer, content designer.	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
josephgreek.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Joseph Greek – Writer, Designer, Digital Content & SEO Strategist	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
denniscoday.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Dennis Coday – Writer, journalist, editor, educator	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
autumnjonssen.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Autumn Jonssen – Technical Writing/Instructional Design Consultant	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joegrabontechwriter.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Joe Grabon, Technical Writer	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
natisextra.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Natalie Degraffinried – Writer, editor, professional overthinker	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
naliakao.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Naliaka.O – Freelance Writer, Editor and Social Media Consultant	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hannahvoss.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hannah Voss – Writer and content designer based in London	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joewarnimont.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Joe Warnimont - WordPress Technical Writer	en	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lukenothstine.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Luke Nothstine – Editor \| Writer	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aegistrust.com.au ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Aegis Trust - Technical Writing and Editing Services	AU en	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
barbarajstarmans.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Freelance Writer, Web Designer, Author, Barbara J Starmans	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonwacker.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	JonWacker.com – Technical Writing	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonjachura.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Jon Jachura – Technical Writer – Technical Writing Services	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sydhayman.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Syd Hayman – Writer \| Editor	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carriebrewerwrites.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Technical Writing \| Carrie Brewer Writing	en	freelance-writing Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.