Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to hanefit.com

헤네핏 | 헤어·뷰티 선별샵 · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
42match
3waau.com
3WAAU 쓰리와우
4 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categoryhair-care
41match
coringco.com
코링코
5 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybeauty
41match
cellamo.com
탈모샴푸 두피앰플 전문 쎄라모
4 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryhair-care
40match
medipickme.com
메디픽미 공식몰-당신의 선택이 플러스 되도록
5 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
40match
banggiwon.com
닥터방기원 온라인 공식 쇼핑몰
2 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorybeauty
39match
cosniz.com
닥터방기원 온라인 공식 쇼핑몰
2 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorybeauty
39match
brecipe.com
뷰티레시피
4 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
38match
di-ezer.com
디에제르│불만족시 100% 환불
5 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryhair-care
37match
adulre.com
아듈레 adulre
5 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorybeauty
37match
hamelbeauty.com
하멜
4 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
36match
cospaniel.com
코스파니엘
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
36match
bonaoneshop.com
보나원글로벌(Bona One Global)
2 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categoryhair-care
36match
mala-mala-ma.com
malamalama 말라말라마
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybeauty
36match
jeilmiyong.com
제일미용유통
5 co-citations0 shared tech2 shared categoryhair-care
36match
cellinum.com
셀리넘_CELLINUM_두피케어_기능성화장품_전문브랜드
4 co-citations0 shared tech2 shared categoryhair-care
35match
lapalettebeauty.com
lapalette
5 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
35match
jellpang.com
손톱 위에 팡! 젤팡
5 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorynail-care
34match
bblab-official.com
BB LAB
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.