Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to haneffinger.com

portfolio | han effinger · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
76match
juliagerritsen.com
juliagerritsen
3 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
68match
lara-al-hadeedi.com
Lara Al-Hadeedi, Art Director
2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
68match
guidomitidieri.com
gumi
3 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
68match
adriannak.com
Adrianna Kusmierczyk
2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categoryfine-art
68match
baileymeadow.com
bailey meadow
3 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
68match
cemaltinoz.com
Cemal Works
2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydigital-arts
68match
georginahenry.com
Georgina Henry
2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
66match
jiaqivisual.com
JIAQI
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
66match
heyallyson.com
Allyson Griffiths
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
64match
dididiwu.com
di.d.wu
2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
64match
fernandanunez.com
flotsamstudio
2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
64match
cebecebe.com
Linda Cebe Portfolio
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
61match
jackieanzaldi.com
Jackie Anzaldi Creative Director
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
59match
juliannabach.com
Studio J.B.
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
59match
manuelabarretot.com
manuelabarretot
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
59match
jaclynarellano.com
jaclyn arellano
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
59match
elinachenyiying.com
Elina Chen
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
59match
federicaricci.com
Federica Ricci
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.