Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to handythor.com

· ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
65match
mangobajar.com
0 co-citations7 shared tech1 shared categorydevelopmental-sites
65match
jawjo.com
0 co-citations7 shared tech1 shared categorydevelopmental-sites
61match
jeffmullis.com
0 co-citations7 shared tech1 shared categorydevelopmental-sites
61match
jhavier.com
0 co-citations7 shared tech1 shared categorydevelopmental-sites
61match
mamaluvsdisney.com
0 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorydevelopmental-sites
61match
jodipiros.com
0 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorydevelopmental-sites
61match
baezmail.com
0 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorydevelopmental-sites
58match
manyfavorites.com
0 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorydevelopmental-sites
50match
gulfstarsnet.com
GSN
0 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorydevelopmental-sites
50match
admegypt.com
ADM
0 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorydevelopmental-sites
50match
apu-international.com
0 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorydevelopmental-sites
47match
fenwayprojects.com
0 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorydevelopmental-sites
46match
jainavinash.com
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydevelopmental-sites
46match
jheibilliard.com
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydevelopmental-sites
46match
bazaarsodai.com
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydevelopmental-sites
46match
ballybudaejjigae.com
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydevelopmental-sites
46match
elgrecopizzanj.com
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydevelopmental-sites
46match
geofflyman.com
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydevelopmental-sites

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.