Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to haataja.dev

Emilio Haataja - Software Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
arlwinf.com
Arlwin Fajardo | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
bibekstha.me
Bibek Shrestha - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
krislito.com
Kris Lito | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ktleary.com
Kevin Leary — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
billchandos.dev
Bill Chandos - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
arjundhaliwal.com
Arjun Dhaliwal | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ktariayman.com
Ayman Ktari — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andriyviychuk.com
Andriy Viychuk - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
alamdev.tech
Alam | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
anmolagrawal.dev
Anmol Agrawal - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ankurraj.tech
Ankur Raj | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
arijitdebnath.com
Arijit Debnath - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
kutaykarademir.com
Kutay Karademir | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
maticsulc.com
Matic Šulc - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
paracosm.mx 🇲🇽
Gerardo Nille - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ioannou.dev
Costas Ioannou - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
maxluong.dev
Max Luong | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
kyleknaggs.com
Kyle Knaggs | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.