Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to gtcameron.com

Cameron Codes · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
krisoncode.com
Kris on code
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
halpincodes.com
Halpin Codes
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
docodethatmatters.com
Do Code That Matters
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
aaroncreor.com
Aaron Creor
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
kylejeske.com
Bit by Bit | A blog about coding, technology, and software development.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
rockcancode.com
Rock Can Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
cameronroberts.uk 🇬🇧
Home | Cameron Roberts
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
thescienceofcode.com
The Science of Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
hackercodex.com
Hacker Codex
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
benc.dev
Pulse Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
matheusrich.com
Recent Posts | Rich Codes
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
matecdev.com
MatecDev | Mathematics, Technology, and Software Development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
greyblake.com
Posts | Serhii Potapov (greyblake)
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
pixcoders.com
Rafal Spacjer blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
thesmoggiecoder.com
All posts | The Smoggie Coder
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
pieceofcode.com
Piece of code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
mauicode.com
Maui Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
rooftopruby.com
Rooftop Ruby Podcast
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.