Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to grupotensa.com

Grupo Tensa - Grupo TENSA · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
grupoanibal.com
Home - Grupo Anibal
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
grupo-agk.com
INICIO - GRUPO AGK
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
grupoaleromex.com
Inicio - Grupo Aleromex
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
gruconsa.com
Gruconsa - Grupo Conector S.A.
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
grupo-firena.com
Inicio - Grupo Firena
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
clsogrupo.com
CLSO Grupo | clsogrupo.com
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
grupo-sh.com
Grupo SH
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
grupo-ruiz.com
Grupo Ruiz | Grupo Ruiz
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
groupfcn.com
- Grupo Ferretero El Constructor Norte
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
grupoalzare.com
Grupo Alzare
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
grupobase.es 🇪🇸
Construcción obra civil y edificación en España - GRUPO BASE
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
67match
grup3g.com
grup3G - grup3G
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
67match
conde.com.mx 🇲🇽
Grupo Conde.- Construcción y Desarrollo
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
67match
grupopuntoalto.mx 🇲🇽
Grupo Punto Alto
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
67match
grupopuntoalto.com.mx 🇲🇽
Grupo Punto Alto
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
66match
grupoarnavind.com
Construcción Integral y Arcotechos en Texcoco | Grupo Arnavind
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
66match
redesyproteccion.es 🇪🇸
EMPRESA - Redes y Protección
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
66match
gruaspadec.com
Padec - Gruas Padec
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.