Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to grupodoin.com

Grupo DOIN – UFPE · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
blogdoadrianoveloso.com
Blog do Adriano Veloso – Blog de ciências
2 shared topicsscience
60match
benjaminhawn.com
Benjamin Hawn Dot Com
2 shared topicsphysics
60match
0xpblab.org
0xpbl Labs
2 shared topicsphysics
35match
blogibcgepa.com
Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisa em Adaptação – INSTITUTO BENJAMIN CONSTANT
1 shared topicsscience
34match
grupobriet.com
BRIET - Grupo BRIET
1 shared topicsscience
31match
clubecriacionista.com
INÍCIO | Clube Criacionista | Ciências das Origens
1 shared topicsscience
30match
acertte.org
REVISTA CIENTÍFICA ACERTTE - ISSN 2763-8928
1 shared topicsscience
30match
abptgic.org
ABPTGIC
1 shared topicsscience
30match
abcterra.com
Início - ABC Terra
1 shared topicsscience
30match
artha-research.com
Artha Research is a committed cosmetic CRO
1 shared topicsscience
30match
assessoriaciencia.com
Escrever Ciência | Serviços de Escrita e Revisão Científica Profissional
1 shared topicsscience
30match
astresmetodologias.com
As Três Metodologias
1 shared topicsscience
30match
asulcon.com
Revista Cientifica da Academia Sul-Mato-Grossense de Ciências Contábeis - ASULCON
1 shared topicsscience
30match
atlasnexo.com
Atlas Nexo — Revista de Ciência
1 shared topicsscience
30match
blogdaciencia.com
Blog da Ciência - Um universo por descobrir.
1 shared topicsscience
30match
brasilinovacao.com
LIP - laboratório de Inovação e Pesquisa | Inteligência de Dados
1 shared topicsscience
30match
brasilpelaciencia.com
Brasil pela Ciência
1 shared topicsscience
30match
clickinclusao.com
Blog - Click Inclusão
1 shared topicsscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.