Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to grudnicki.com

Derek Grudnicki · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
mat3o.com
Matthew Nowicki
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
fazilmohamed.com
Fazil
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
bigzoo.me
Chris Nyaga
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
aalazz.me
Alexis Lazzarotto — Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
abuzer.tech
Abuzer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
matroussilhe.com
Mathieu Roussilhe
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
max-heller.com
Max Heller | Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
mazzapaolo.com
Paolo Mazza
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
roddehugo.com
Hugo Rodde
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
thepaulstella.com
Paul A. Stella II
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
bigtrendmobil.com
BIG Trendmobil | Software Engineering
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
abbeyhawksparrow.com
Abbey Hawk Sparrow : Software Developer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
albaraamansour.dev
Al-Baraa Mansour
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
maxhogan.dev
Max Hogan
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
romanrux.com
ROMAN RUX — software engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
alexborisov.org
Alex Borisov
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
andrewhachten.com
Andrew Hachten • Personal Site
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
bhavyachadha.com
Bhavya Chadha
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.